RE:RE:RE:RE:VentureguyWith all due respect Shelbs, I think that you are missing the point.
I don't think that individuals must be categorized as positive or negative. Good or bad.
DD and Goldn1 were big promoters of GMA, but things changed...I used to think that Goldn1 was a cheerleader for GMA. I disliked also the reference to pm in the posts.
Delays are normal, no discussion about it. The issue is not the delays, it is more the reasons why we have these these delays.
And management dropped the balls big time with the explanations. There was no press release, but only private communication with shareholders (or public when they were meetings at Lebel-sur-Quevillon with 75 people). And what was said was:
-July sucks for news report;
-The Qualified person is on vacation;
-The other Qualified person is on vacation;
-Its coming, look at the corporate presentation, we put that in writting;
- ...
The absence of justification for the delays is the problem. The constant change of reasons for the delays made a lot of investors doubt about the good faith of the management.
This is only my humble opinion and what bugs me with GMA. I can accept delays. I have a hard time accepting questionnable reasons to accept delays though.
Moulouk