Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by hammer161on Dec 18, 2014 7:24pm
137 Views
Post# 23246870

RE:RE:RE:BGM - 1.1 MILLION INDICATED 3.9 INFERRED.

RE:RE:RE:BGM - 1.1 MILLION INDICATED 3.9 INFERRED.
armchairanalyst wrote: How so Hammer.....they will be right back in the 10 000 000 + oz range...as oh ya...Snowden re assayed...further is building a PEA again for Modeling purposes.

Great Great Great Great Hunting

Mike 


So Mikey - how do they double the ounces with only 5 new holes and some additional sampling in the existing holes? Keep in mind that the extra samples are a second pass and will not likely be of the same grade as the first round. Also if the historic holes had no QAQC and still don't there will not be a huge conversion from inferred to indicated. Go read the July 18th, 2014 press release and you will see very few samples prior to 2010 were re-run - less than 2%. Oh and you have things the wrong way around - you model the deposit first, calculate the resources and THEN do the PEA using many economic variables and metallurgy etc. Things would be a lot easier, and you would take less of a public beating, if you just did a bit of reading and educated yourself before posting.
Bullboard Posts