Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Nevada Copper Corp NEVDQ

Nevada Copper Corp is a Canada-based mining company. The Company is engaged in the development, operation, and exploration of its copper project (the Project) at its Pumpkin Hollow Property (the Property) in Western Nevada, United States of America. Its two fully permitted projects include the high-grade Underground Mine and processing facility, which is undergoing a restart of operations, and a large-scale open pit PFS stage project. The Property is located in northwestern Nevada and consists of approximately 24,300 acres of contiguous mineral rights including approximately 10,800 acres of owned private land and leased patented claims. Pumpkin Hollow is located approximately 8 miles southeast of the small town of Yerington, Nevada in Lyon County, one- and one-half hours drive southeast of Reno. The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary is Nevada Copper, Inc.


GREY:NEVDQ - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by thomsonion Jan 02, 2015 9:54am
115 Views
Post# 23279282

Cost Savings?

Cost Savings?Phase One Output=6500 TPD Phase Two Output=70,000 TPD Total Mill Capacity Reqd= 76,500 TPD Originally, Phase One was proposed as a "standalone project", and I would assume this would require a 6500 TPD capacity mill. However, with the land bill passing and with the Open Pit permitting expecting to be complete this year, it makes far more sense to construct one 76500 T/D capacity mill to handle both ore streams. Based on input, the underground mine would be required to supply 6500/76500 or only 8% of the larger mill cost now with 92% to be financed by the open pit. I am wondering what the potential cost savings are for the underground mine portion of the project now that the future Open pit mine will have to kick in 92% of the equity for the new mill. So we got the 200my renewed for a standalone mine....but now instead of paying for 100% of a smaller mill, we now only have to pay 8% of a much larger mill and concentrator based on throughput. I have yet to dig out these costs, but I think the savings for a shared mill and concentrator facilty could be very significant. Thoughts?
Bullboard Posts