RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Korelin Update1320racing wrote: It was just a verbal repeat of the NR content for the sight impaired like the audio books you can buy. The fact that you had two scientifically unqualified hosts who were clearly cheerleading the discussion should not be cause to change a skeptic's opinion. I would rather see top cancer scientists from the Cleveland Clinic or the Mayo Clinic give their opinions about what TLT is trying to accomplish than a couple of bozo's on a radio program who clearly have something to gain by endorsing TLT. It is still an early stage experimental procedure so let's not lose sight of that fact. So far, we haven't seen a game changing moment like what the Wright brothers accomplished.
They have a relationship with AK and Associates for their form 20f regulatory stuff for us listing purposes.
They took an interest of course and consultation with Doc Richard Postma and another doc... who have a background in oncology/urology
They are certainly not bozo's. Sight impaired? A lot of people enjoy radio interviews. You're are easily discrediting yourself here... keep talking basher boy. Where do you people come from? wowo
They provide full disclosure which is a good and proper thing along with your standard disclosure they encourage you to do your own DD and that they are not offering advice to buy or sell TLT.
They are a us radio show with 2 million listeners and covering stocks is what they do. Should they shut down their radio show because you interpret them without good reasion to be pumpers? They're very reasonable analysts and well educated. The US exposure they offer TLT, is a great thing. If you are a shareholder of TLT and follow the science and commentary, you should be thrilled.
There are plenty of peer reviewed published papers coming from top scientists and clinics in the world in relevant fields to TLT that can interest you but if mayo clinic or cleveland clinic are all you trust, you'd have to talk to them for find another stock to follow that does collaborate with them.