Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Andover Mining Corp. V.AOX

A precious and base metal exploration company


TSXV:AOX - Post by User

Post by doscoon Jan 07, 2015 11:53am
414 Views
Post# 23294223

then court

then courtMist reject an unsocial offer to protect stakeholders. Especially if inspectors and bidder is the same and as well the same as the debtor. this is legal... that one party is in role of all three. furthermore this party caused the banc. Court must restart the whole process with a new trutsee. Amercan shareholder should write this TODAY to the court. By the way rio is not ruling enirgi. Enirgi is a very huge firm. They cancelled the jv but now wants the assets. Hey... really. Thats legal?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>