RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Timelines!bencro, Honestly, I did not realize your level of insecurity regarding my posts until now. By the way, I almost did not read today's posts until I was informed of this 2nd attack by you on me today. Too much to cover here w/o boring all others to tears... but there is one item that highlights you as the glowing liar that you are and something that must be countered. Specifically, you infer that I called 6 top TLT specialists "used car salesman"... that Is clearly a lie. Not even your most ardent lackey will ever find that reference but I should not be surprised as you did this once before in your hair growth accusation of me. I did, IN FACT, refer to Roger as a used car salesman. I mean what else do you call a CEO that won't address his missing current timelines by years in some cases and months in others. All of a sudden, after a spring/summer of interviews where you couldn't shut the man up, he is suddenly a man with few words! No problem... bencro is there to fill in the excuse. Here's a question: When did Roger actually file the TLC-2000 review with HC? Was it before or after Thanksgiving? No need to answer... I already know? For those of you who have listened to Roger's 1st half 2014 interviews, Roger must have used the word ABSOLUTELY a half a dozen times when asked about status or timelines. Now where I come from the word absolutely means without qualification or restriction. In other words, ABSOLUTELY. Then of course this word means something different to Roger. So, the simple question is, can the shareholders here get an update from Roger on timelines/status? Oh, and that doesn't mean a response from that liar bencro. I think the shareholders would appreciate a direct response from Roger.