RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Easy BuyI am going to expand on what Tweedlede is getting at in terms of what is acceptable or not to a physician considering writing a prescription for a patient.
It took me over 2 frustrating years fighting with my Doctor about trying MMJ. He was perfectly happy writing me prescriptions to accepted Pharma drugs- but refused to write one for MMJ for me to try.
I finally got fed up and luckily the the new MMPR was enacted and I was able to make an appointment at a brand new MJ clinic that opened up and see another GP and get a prescription.
So yes, your family doctor has a lot of say in what drugs you are prescribed.
Tweedlede wrote: MagicBeans wrote: Now, I have to disagree that smokers will only want Bedrocans weed because there will be many strains available from even more producers that patients will become fond of. If we were all able to smoke the ditch weed and unreliable product before, I don't think the average consumer is going to care about the uniformity to the nth degree that Bedrocan professes to deliver. Its an upgrade, no matter who you get your smoke from now.
You're entire argument is flawed when in context to Bedrocan. You are talking about an open recreational market here, where choice is given to the consumer.
Choice for MEDICAL MJ is dictated by the physiscian. Doctors are mostly comfortable prescribing in a manner that Bedrocan only provides. And for that reason, Doctors will prefer to deal with bedrocan. If you went to your doctor with Arthritis, and said you wanted to deal with Tweed because they have a nice strain of Purple Kush, you would get sent out the door.
Bedrocan will most likely not even participate in recreational sales, as they want to own legitimacy for their products medical value. Not their buzz.
Bedrocan will certainly increase in value should recreational come to exist, but it will not be your best play if your betting on recreational. Bedcrocan is my hedge bet that the Conservatives win, and recreational DOESNT exist.