GREY:PGDIF - Post by User
Comment by
robybobon Jan 26, 2015 6:12pm
61 Views
Post# 23365314
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD in-situ values then and now
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:PGD in-situ values then and nowthanks ekim, so your adding off the chart both CH6 and CH6 (i)?
first one is inferred mineral resource and talks about carats etc., the second is kimberlite tonnage, if they added another 3.2-4.38 tonnage to CH6, that would be more than 15% No?
What I added was the new mineral resource estimate of CH6, now updated to 8.57 million carats, then took the tonnage of 7 and 44 multiplied by 1.04 to get carats. Just over 18 million, on the high end of the numbers
dazed and confused