RE:RE:RE:Flake size, Purity and CrystallinityBobGreenfield wrote: TidalPool, with all due respect, your post contained conclusions that at this point simply cannot be validated, therefore, cannot be a valid conclusion. Zenyatta has not supplied any past or current data that could support your summary. Once you can back it up with actual data regarding samples and the processes applied to them, we'll have a valid discussion.
Zenyattas last presser flies directly contrary to your summary and you know it.
TidalPool wrote: Funny not a word of rebuttal from the "Scientist", the Baird (aka Thief) or the Boob aka the Boob? What still working on this one? Or would just rather ply insults?
BOOB, with all due respect, your post contained conclusions that at this point simply cannot be validated, therefore, cannot be a valid conclusion. Zenyatta has not supplied any past or current data that could support your summary. Once you can back it up with actual data regarding samples and the processes applied to them, we'll have a valid discussion. bye bye boob