RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Remember this?Wait, Boob, we've already talked about your common sense, you forgot already? Remember, chit for brains, Boob, do you remember now? Are you a lawyer boob? Are you sitting in a Vancouver fog right now?
BobGreenfield wrote: Zen2twenty, here's what the presser stated "A technically feasible & distinctive process flow sheet was developed and
work continues to fully optimize it to meet customer expectations on purity."
Common sense tells you that if meeting customer expectations on purity requires further optimization work on the process, then the current state of optimization of the process does not produce a product that currently meets customer purity expectations.
zen2twenty wrote: Boob, more speculations. Can you post the presser that states they are "trying" to meet customer expectations? No Boob you can't. Now, read this slowly, Our priority is on defining the best possible process AND meeting customer expectations on product quality for a broad range of applications with demanding specifications. Also, this is the USDOE project approach, Building a U.S. supply chain and competitive industry • ORNL provides a one of a kind leadership facility for industry to collaborate • Access and IP protected collaboration • Resource for – Chemical and materials suppliers – Battery manufacturers and their customers – System integrators – Original equipment manufacturers • Development of processes, process optimization, manufacturing schemes, materials improvements, diagnostics, and production yield. Do you think they may need a range of purities Boob? Go back and read the presser Boob, SSSLLLLOOOOWWWWLLLLYYY. Don't speculate or assume, you're bad at that Boob.