RE:RE:stock value in a merger threadPerdy,
You're so inane as to actually be amusing. In the last 24 hours you've both vehemently ranted that we all ignore TheDave as he posts the same stuff all the time, yet you do it yourself. That's pretty much par for the course on what you offer.
When I joined is true, I'm not sure anyone else has given you credit for any consequence to come out of that observation. Just tell us all the sky is blue too - sure it's true, tell me why we care or think you're astute to have observed it.
And yes, before the well costs were publicly stated, the well was late and management wasn't reporting. Suroco did that once too, and they were hiding a well cost that blew up the company. $15mm was the max in the contract.
But you know what? whether it was $15mm or not, my conclusion was still right - the stock was going down. If it had been $15mm, we'd be even lower today!
come up with some new material for the benefit of all of us please.
I do get baited into taking you on, but let's talk about the company and the market. You get owned on your half truths and arguments, then have nothing better to come back with than personal attacks.
You're so one dimensional and often viscious in your attacks, I hope for all of us CSIS can check identities on this, you personality traits are scary enough I hope you aren't this rash in the real world.