Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Callinan Royalties Corporation CCNMF



GREY:CCNMF - Post by User

Post by Canadamooseon Feb 19, 2015 11:59am
291 Views
Post# 23443863

The Difference between Screwed and Stewed Stockholders

The Difference between Screwed and Stewed Stockholders If the stockholders cannot prove they have been screwed,  I guess all they can do is be a state of 
being stewed.   And CAA stockholders have every right to feel Stewed.  
     Lets talk about appearances.    TheY dump the CEO who is a consumate dealmaker and then sell out the Hudbay Claim for virtually nothing and give away an absolutely iron  grip on the balls of GRO for a lot less than the value of the paper grip they held on GRO.
   Two funny looking deals in a row like that.    Lets look at HudBay.  Proponents of the give away could argue that  CAA did not expect to win in someone's view.   So they give away a claim directly relating to extremely egregious behavior claiming I guess that the legal merits in Canada were borderline.  I wonder about that.  The kicker is that it was be very measure an entirely legitimate claim and therefore included in the reality of such a legitimate claim was certainly some sort of significant cloud or clouds on Hudbay in terms of being aaquired  merging or getting financing.  Now certainly no one should maintain a claim for the purpose of a cloud but  to give away a claim like that for nothing leads me to raise that point.    Lets give an analogy.  That offense by Hud Bay is like an excon asking the victim to agree to his record being expunged while at the same time  telling the victim that reasonable restitution must be waived.   Pretty good work management and I'll bet their is no risk in Canada or you wouldn't have done it twice in a row.   As to Roland.  I dont know about everything he did,   but i read between the lines on his deals and he really was a consumate deal maker and new management took care of that.
     
 Canada Moose       If any stockholder agrees with me and you know a financial journalist, maybe they would look into the story.    Never know what they might uncover.    
   

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse