GREY:CCNMF - Post by User
Post by
Canadamooseon Feb 19, 2015 11:59am
291 Views
Post# 23443863
The Difference between Screwed and Stewed Stockholders
The Difference between Screwed and Stewed Stockholders If the stockholders cannot prove they have been screwed, I guess all they can do is be a state of
being stewed. And CAA stockholders have every right to feel Stewed.
Lets talk about appearances. TheY dump the CEO who is a consumate dealmaker and then sell out the Hudbay Claim for virtually nothing and give away an absolutely iron grip on the balls of GRO for a lot less than the value of the paper grip they held on GRO.
Two funny looking deals in a row like that. Lets look at HudBay. Proponents of the give away could argue that CAA did not expect to win in someone's view. So they give away a claim directly relating to extremely egregious behavior claiming I guess that the legal merits in Canada were borderline. I wonder about that. The kicker is that it was be very measure an entirely legitimate claim and therefore included in the reality of such a legitimate claim was certainly some sort of significant cloud or clouds on Hudbay in terms of being aaquired merging or getting financing. Now certainly no one should maintain a claim for the purpose of a cloud but to give away a claim like that for nothing leads me to raise that point. Lets give an analogy. That offense by Hud Bay is like an excon asking the victim to agree to his record being expunged while at the same time telling the victim that reasonable restitution must be waived. Pretty good work management and I'll bet their is no risk in Canada or you wouldn't have done it twice in a row. As to Roland. I dont know about everything he did, but i read between the lines on his deals and he really was a consumate deal maker and new management took care of that.
Canada Moose If any stockholder agrees with me and you know a financial journalist, maybe they would look into the story. Never know what they might uncover.