skibet wrote: You answered nothing thanks. We can try again:
-Why is finding marble when you were drilling for graphite good? Shouldnt you be worried you did not hit graphite?
-Why is CCB not going to PDAC?
-You say the material will be mined and sold, how is that going to happen without permits?
-Stop bringin up info from the 1900s, they left for a reason....
- It is visible to the naked eye, so they must, again chiefy, unreal you can say this. You know this is why the put mining and resource regulations in place right? To avoid jokes like this.
-Stop saying because they are planning (planning) to go with resource estimates that they must have it, as mentioned, I have the biggest D!ck in the world, but guiness wont put me in the record books, I told them I was going to get it measured so it must be what I say right? So just because they are planning it does not mean chit.
I am done here today, the board is yours to spew more pumps and dumps.
gonefishing5879 wrote: 5. CCB has announced that they will be conducting a resource estimate on both their graphite and marble ores. A resource estimate has been the missing piece in the CCB story and until now they did not plan to spend the money to produce such a report. Clearly they believe they have an economic quantity of both graphite and marble. They wouldn’t be doing a resource estimate on graphite if the holes were barren, as some allege. In January, CCB reported that there were 133 core samples at the lab for graphite assay. They know there is graphite in the core because it is visible to the naked eye.