Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Southern Pacific Resource Corp STPJF

Southern Pacific Resource Corp. is a Canada-based company, which is engaged in the thermal production of heavy oil in Senlac, Saskatchewan on a property known as STP-Senlac, and thermal production of bitumen on a property located in the Athabasca region of Alberta known as STP-McKay, as well as exploration for and development of in-situ oil sands in the Athabasca region of Alberta. Its STP-McKay property consists of oil sands leases totaling approximately 37,760 acres. The Company’s operations also include Anzac, Hangingstone and Ells. The Company’s STP-McKay property is located approximately 45 kilometers northwest Ft. McMurray. The Anzac project covers approximately 117 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic. The Company owns 80% interest in Hangingstone project. The Ells project covers approximately 164 kilometers of two-dimensional (2D) seismic.


GREY:STPJF - Post by User

Comment by dbinvestoron Feb 26, 2015 3:26pm
282 Views
Post# 23469248

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Affidavit: "...McKay and Senlac ...grossly mismanaged"

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Affidavit: "...McKay and Senlac ...grossly mismanaged"My post is about getting some of the facts out that are buried in the affidavit/court docs. Seems many people woldl rather read these posts then the source documents :)

I wouldnt expect a sucessful challenge to the Queen's bench on their decisionsso far  Although the bid deadline was extended to April 27 from end of March so I wonder if the complaint from the Holders about a very short timeframe was considered by the judge.

The fact the monitor dismissed the suggestions does not mean that they are not valid.

I dont think the monitor is motivated to entertain corrective action suggestions. Being a monitor does not make you an expert on operations or even finance matters. Their job now is to follow the process of CCAA. They will rely on management's direction for other operational imputs and we know how management  has responded in the past to investor suggestions from the affidavit...

From my reading through the affidavit it appears to me that they are trying to document a history of inaction that has caused this decline.  This can setup for court action later. Who knows whether that will ever happen however.

Time to wait and see how things transpire on this one. Is it an asset sale which guts the company (I see this a high probability) , a finance/investment that retires the 1st lien holders and lets the company continue or a combination of both..
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse