RE:RE:RE:RVX ValuationHi bfw. Good points.
However, I don't understand your point in the second last paragraph. Unless I misunderstood the $30,000,000 LOC extension by KD is there to fund BETonMACE and IMHO is not an issue at all.
In additon, the cost of this trial is dramatically reduced from Don's original phase 2/3 trial proposal presented in October of 2014. In my previous post I said $25,000,000 to be conservative but I actually think BETonMACE may be under $20,000,000. The information is available but I just don't have time to go back and check it. Hopefully other posters can confirm or straighten me out.
There is also the possibility that BETonMACE, which is a progressive (not the right word but it's what I remember) trial it could end early because if the RRR at various measurement periods is really high (e.g. 70% plus like the post hoc) then it could become statistically significant early in the trial and this could bring up the obvious ethical issue.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but I am absolutely convinced that BETonMACE is fully funded by the LOC.
Cheers and have a great weekend. I buried in wonderful snow in Muskoka.
Toinv :)