RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bought Deal at $3.40<p> your comparison is completley flawed. They didn't want to bring "Warren Buffet" in because he's Warren Buffet. That deal was done at the brink of the financial crisis. No one was lending money, even to Goldman. They did the deal out of necessity and it was expensive. If they could have got commerical terms from a bank, they would rather pay half the coupon i'm sure. Goldman didn't need Buffet's stamp of approval.<br /> <br /> These guys needed Goodman i'm sure to get market awareness up. I agree with that. But that was then and this is now. I'm not suggesting they had better options then. I'm saying they should have better options now. <br /> </p> <p> The use of proceeds are clearly stated to partially reduce indebtedness. I'm not sure what we're wasting time arguing about here. Obviously company agrees that debt paper was expensive and raised equity to pay it down.</p>