RE:RE:RE:RE:Why... to clarence: LOL . It's healthy to have a good laugh. As a reader of Count of Monte Christo you have to admit that he could not be accused of complacency and most certainly not count St. Germain either and the writer Alexander Dumas most certainly knew that too. yes neither of them could correct all of the wrong-doings but they tried. And before they tried to correct they tried to get to the truth. Even if Dennis Fong could not correct the situation he should try. However, I would understand if he is so discouraged that he does not try but then he should not have accepted the position and he most certainly should not have used ignorance as an excuse to do nothing. Not even if his ignorance should be real. As for the cheating fom the beginning of the stockmarket I do not agree with that either. Sure there was cheating but it reached new dimensions with the Supercomputers which admittedly the banks and other brokers are using today. All the very serious accusations are answered with silence. Indeed it is the best they can do. They have been accused that they do not execute the orders as they come in but that they buy in bulk (This they even admit). Also, that they can place one order ahead of an other one has been made public by programming- experts. AVO does business with CIBC. Sure they should have the clout to pressure banks to stop this dishonest business. If that should be to much to be asked then it is still inexcusable to be coplacent and ignorant. Economy, at the time of Count St. Germain meant brotherhood meaning one works for others and for the good of all mankind. We don't have to elaborate that brother cheat each other also and we certainly don't have to use this as an excuse to become cheats or even condone crooked behaviour.