Anyone Else Think This Might Be A Bunch of B and S?Check out this link: https://www.medpagetoday.com/MeetingCoverage/ACC/50488
You'll see a familiar figure touting the PSCK9 inhibitors.
But wait: Isn't their reduction of events LOWER than that of RVX-208? Plus, their reduction comes at 12-18 months? Ours was at 6 months.
Plus... the drug is an expensive injectable - and one that involves various potential identified risks...!!!
And don't bring up the "post hoc" argument with me. THEIR analysis is post hoc too.
So here's my question for the Board? Am I missing something or is the big PR capabilities of big pharma just being demonstrated again???
Somebody correct me please if I am overlooking something.