Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by HedgieTdoton Mar 23, 2015 2:04pm
45 Views
Post# 23551410

RE:RE:RE:The 7 LIES from SCHLINKER Alias & NAV at C$0.50

RE:RE:RE:The 7 LIES from SCHLINKER Alias & NAV at C$0.50 The comedy continues.  I'm not "claiming you use personal attacks" I'm observing it.  It's clear for all to see in plain english in all your posts.  I do back up my statements, you just ignore them, others are capable of reading them.

You really like that well cost episode.  I openly resopnded many times with surprise they brought it in on cost, instead of the contractual $15m max in the contract.  Good for them.

one battle isn't the war. since the time of that well, the stock is now only worth about a third of what it was then.  If that's the tape we're being measured by, I can't say I feel very wrong sir.  In fact, instead of misleading, I think I've been correct in leading the direction of the discussion to match the direction of the stock trading.  

Aliases don't matter, not if we're god or mary poppins behind them, the stock will move over the long run based on the business performace and promise. to make money, either direction, educated debate on the perfomance of the macroeconomy and the business are what this forum should be about.

Bring some arguments to the board that hold water, all readers welcome them.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>