Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Lithium Americas Corp T.LAC

Alternate Symbol(s):  LAC

Lithium Americas Corp. is a lithium resource company. The Company is focused on advancing Thacker Pass to production. The Company owns 100% of the Thacker Pass project, which is located in Humboldt County in northern Nevada, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Lithium Nevada Corp. Thacker Pass is situated at the southern end of the McDermitt Caldera, approximately 60 miles (100 kilometers) northwest of Winnemucca, in Humboldt County, northern Nevada. Its subsidiaries include RheoMinerals Inc., KV project LLC, and 1339480 B.C. Ltd.


TSX:LAC - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Stocktreeon Mar 24, 2015 8:38am
98 Views
Post# 23554111

Quality tests: no news good or bad?

Quality tests: no news good or bad?
We have no news no only on any agreement between POSCO and LAC, but also regarding those six tonnes of lithium compound sent to end users and potential customers to be assessed.
Care to weigh in on what that secrecy could mean about the quality of the product or the intentions of the players? No news on product quality good or bad? No news on the effectiveness or cost efficiency of the process good or bad? No news on POSCO's potential next move good or bad?

"POSCO has advised that initial test results indicate that the Demo Plant is achieving or exceeding all initial performance targets as it has operated on a continuous 24 hour production cycle."
That statement was contradictory, since six tonnes would have been below the companies "several hundred tonne per year target". Since then, they were supposed to be tweaking the process...
Bullboard Posts