Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Barkerville Gold Mns Ltd BGMZF

Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd is a Canada based company operates in the business of Gold. It is engaged in the production and sale of gold, and the exploration, development, and acquisition of mineral properties in British Columbia. The mineral tenures cover approximately 2,000 square kilometres. The company primarily holds interests in Cariboo Gold Belt District, Island Mountain, Cow Mountain and Barkerville Mountain.


OTCQX:BGMZF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by halcroon Apr 12, 2015 3:05pm
69 Views
Post# 23621282

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE "Dance of the sugar plum morons"

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE "Dance of the sugar plum morons"
borisY wrote:

Halcro wrote:
Good point, MP. Accountability, etc. as in timely disclosure in mandated filings such as insider trading, hmmmm? 



I would not look too hard for any regulatory control on timely disclosures. IMO, the current SC take a very uneven hand as to what they'll go after.
 

Case in point, look at the slap down that BGM got when FC was heading things and the PG report came out.... Ok. you can argue that that was a justifiable slap down and maybe it was.

But there is a current fiasco running with AEM and its SOL take over. Just take a read of

https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.sol/soltoro-ltd?postid=23618232


In summary, in the SOL case, AEM has overstated gold equivalent reserves by 18% on a company wide basis, yet the regulators are cool with that and they are even cool AEM doing deals to buy juniors using their stock as cash.  

How many other cases like this is the billy man sitting on?

Hardly seems fair but they I say you gotta remember that Canada is the home of the billy, the hill billy, the plains billy and in Ottawa, the hockey billy.... and the billy don't give a rats behind about minor deals when good guys are involved.

So, son, you just gotta move on past those missing Sedi filings. The billy man just really care, except occasionally, the billy will take a billy club to some poor no friend junior and beat him silly... aka the BGM put down... justified, mabye, but definitely not consistent behavior on billy's part....

Just calling it like it is and was....



Aweel, it ain't over till it's over.

Those missing Sedi filings ain't missing; they just haven't seen the light of day yet.

Even though the 2012-01-27-appointed consultant and 2014-10-01-appointed director didn't the his initial insider reports until 2014-10-01 and didn't completely file the direct and indirect BGM shareholdings until 2015-03-17 (even though, as a consultant to Alliance Mining from 2012-08-09 and a private placement participant from 2012-11-20, Sedi filings for direct and indirect holdings were filed on 2012-11-28), the filings were made, albeit late.

And prodding seems to have worked wonders with the BCSC: bring matters to their attention and matters seem to get done.

And, now that the holdings are much clearer as of 2015-03-17 (who'd have thunk that 3,544,790 BGM shares WEREN"T on mandated Sedi filings and weren't revealed until late in the game?), there's now the matter of the still-extant website postings supporting the now-rubbished Peter George flight of fancy to be resolved by someone at some time.

And then there's the excellent documentation provided by Mr. Pocklington...which seems to be a matter of some import, and will my view of its import be supported by others?

Aweel, it ain't over till it's over.

Bullboard Posts