Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Cohen & Steers Tax-Adv Pref Secs and Inc Fund V.PTA


Primary Symbol: PTA

The Funds primary investment objective is high current income. The Funds secondary investment objective is capital appreciation The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objectives by investing at least 80% of its managed assets (i.e., net assets plus assets obtained through leverage) in a portfolio of preferred and other income securities issued by U.S. and non-U.S. companies, which may be either exchange-traded or available over-the-counter. In pursuing its investment objectives, the Fund seeks to achieve favorable after-tax returns for its shareholders by seeking to minimize the U.S. federal income tax consequences on income generated by the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund will achieve its investment objectives.


NYSE:PTA - Post by User

Comment by perdikaoilgason Apr 15, 2015 1:11pm
79 Views
Post# 23632485

RE:Q4 2014 Update and Peers' Fundamentals

RE:Q4 2014 Update and Peers' FundamentalsFernando,

Do you really realize that we talk for a new company now that is double in size now compared to 2013 because it pays the former Suroco's employees too?

It seems you do not understand it. A 13% rise in G&A versus 2013 is nothing given that a new whole company with more personnel was added compared to 2013.

Cmon! We talk for the basics here.

How did you miss the US$17 Million FFO in Q4 2014 with Brent at just $70/bbl?

It was YOU who was claiming that FFO in Q3 2014 was very low ignoring the one-time non-recurring costs. Why do you gloss over it now?




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>