Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Callinan Royalties Corporation CCNMF



GREY:CCNMF - Post by User

Comment by btshooteron Apr 15, 2015 3:21pm
195 Views
Post# 23633362

RE:BTSHOOTERS Analysis

RE:BTSHOOTERS AnalysisHi Walfie, I am greatfull for some one that is a shareholder of CAA and not a shareholder of ALS to request more information as I had given up on the total group.

First off shareholders of CAA are getting solicited for their vote by phone. Who is doing this, paying for the cost from who's pocket.

Secondly if you have not yet received this call when you do ask why there is no independent opinion on this transaction?

My bet is the 28% of shareholders that are supporting this transaction, also own signifficant positions in ALS. Some names that come to mind , Roland Butler, John Toggnetti, Carlo Caveli, Mike Muzalowski and maybe Doug Corrigan. HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST TO ALL OTHER SHAREHOLDERS. The last AGM of CAA i Attended was dominated by John Toggnetti, who pulled leagal wranglings to elect his hand picked board, all board members elected own NO SHARES of CAA, at that time. The vote at that meeting was 20 million opposed to 10.5 in favor of J T 's Board.

Durring the melt down in Sept 2008 till March 2009 more than 9 milliom shares were sold and purchased by others, that sell off took CAA from $3.40 all the way to $0.38, very strange as up till that point CAA was tightly held, supposedly. My question, who were the sellers & buyers?

When Caa traded at $0.45 I called MM and asked him to start buying the stock with a normal course issuer bid, with the funds in the company, he diden't do that until months later when the stock traded back to $1.25. Why I always wondered. It's become crystal clear to me now. That time period was factured into the ultimate take out of CAA. By not diong the buy back Mike allowed the sellers to buy back a larger position than that they sold.

There is alot more to be told but if no one wants to know, I won't waste my time here as i have no interest, i took the exit door, don't like dealing with the scumm associated with this transaction.

If you want more your going to have to ask, good luck, bt.


<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse