RE:RE:Predictions on the close contesteljoro wrote: I'll take a more conservative stance and say .74 The Q1 numbers were great but I think most of the price pop from them in the short term has just happened the last few days. Also, analysts (ie. RBC) seem to be fixated on the productions #s being slightly lower than hoped for, which longer term make no difference if a) they hit their yearly #s b) the price of gold goes higher c) they add good drill results and d) get taken out well before then. Anyone else notice the last paragraph of the Q1 report that talked about the new hire being well versed in M&A?
Great post Eljoro. I did see the M&A comment. Funny they would put that in there isn't it. They love teasing us. I agree that we need to be more conservative with our expectations, as we all must remember that this is still TGZ. Plus there were some holes when you dug deeper into the results. TGZ is a great play long term that is no doubt. RUN TGZ RUN!!!!