Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by sudzie191on Apr 29, 2015 10:58am
178 Views
Post# 23676031

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Closed at $1.16

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Closed at $1.16Supplementary if I may

One of the discusion  puzzles involves what size the mill should be for the combined  feeds from Shea Creek, Fission, and NexGen

Hows that for a morning tantalizer over coffee, lol

Stay tuned



sudzie191 wrote: Nice post Uran216

THere are a lot of ideas  being suggested and discussed by various folks about a new production region in the southwest corner of the basin, involving the obvious, Fission of course, Shea Creek just a few miles north, and NexGen on the other side of the lake.

We should begin to hear about these discusions in due course, meantime, enjoy the golf course, lol



Uran216 wrote:

Woundedknee,

There are many good posters other than Quakes. Those posters have gone silent - because there is really nothing to say. There is no concrete reason why the share price (sp) is so undervalued and no idea what and when things will happen in the future. Current posts deal mostly with feelings and suppositions. Quakes is one of the few who places well thought-out facts combined with some of his own theories. Quakes always states what is his opinion and conjunctures.

I own at lot of this stock at very low sp, it doesn't matter what methods I used in my decision to acquire FCU or why I chose to not trade until the buy-out. But, as an owner, I want reliable, positive postings about FCU to counteract the flippant negative postings. If someone posts theories of why the sp is low – fine, even better if they back those writings up with TA thought or news articles. I do want to know if FCU is not hitting U in drilling, giving false reports, and not able to gain financing which would cause work to flounder - but guess what? - FCU has been very successful in all those areas. We hear from posters that hate the way FCU management is doing things (when to post results, financing, options, etc) - but do those posters really have an idea of what FCU mgt overall strategy is and what is being done behind the scenes? I do think, in my opinion, the time is getting much closer to a major happening and others who want to buy in at lower prices also have that feeling.

Concerning the PEA: sure the organizations with NDAs have internal teams creating there own PEAs which they will bring to the bargaining table. I also want an independently-written PEA for FCU to use as a bargaining tool in negotiations.

In speaking with mgt over the past 4 years I do know that Dev wants to make the most money, and have someone create the best U mine they can, from the best mining adventure he will have in his lifetime. So for Dev, and the FCU team, it is the money and the legacy. I have to have confidence the FCU team will have the same great results in selling FCU as they have had in building this discovery.





Bullboard Posts