Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Visible Gold Mines Inc V.VGD

Alternate Symbol(s):  VGMIF

Visible Gold Mines Inc. is a mining exploration company involved in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties with prospects for hosting gold and lithium mineral deposits. Its projects include MegaLi Project, NataLi Project, CarLi Project, and Veronik Property. The MegaLi property (78 mining claims) is located in the region of James Bay, Quebec, covers about 3,996 hectares (ha) of mining land. The NataLi property (107 mining claims) is located in the region of James Bay, Quebec, covering about 5,667 ha of mining land package located 25 kilometers (km) west of Critical Elements' Rose lithium deposit. In CarLi Project, it owns about 125 mining claims covering an area of about 6,400 ha on the newly identified Wachiskw's intrusion. The Veronik property is located about 75 km southeast of Hecla’s Casa Berardi gold mine. The Veronik property is underlain by the mafic volcanic rocks and gabbros of the Clermont-Disson Formation, in the eastern part of the Archean Abitibi belt.


TSXV:VGD - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Oregonduckon May 02, 2015 1:35pm
111 Views
Post# 23688263

RE:RE:When You Have Facts...

RE:RE:When You Have Facts...
Antoninass wrote: Oregonduck

To me, your critic, is not too impressive. when you say, "No insider has sold except for Goodmand & Co. recent 2 MILLION SHARES" , you make it sound like its no big deal. The fact is, it is a big deal when insiders sell 2 million shares and bring the SP down with their move because generally when insiders sell that many shares confidence in the market erodes as happened in this case with VGD, leaving people who invested BECAUSE of the backing of Goodman and McKewen holding shares worth in many cases less than half their original value. At the time I was told by IR that VGD was blindsided by the sale. I was also misled by the false timeline IR was telling me about the releasing of results. Who was behind pumping up a 9 cent stock that had yet to release any results to 26 cents? (close to a 300% increase) . According to Oregonduck it could not have been HEAVEN FORBID Goodman who benefited most selling his 2 million .10 shares and making a great profit at it. Boy, What timing to have sold when he did. Right Oregonduck !!


Hey, Goodman is a shareholder like you and me. You could have sold when the stock was up at, say, $0.26 instead of crying over lost opportunity. Goodman was selling to avoid breaching securities laws ?? The 20% rule dictated that he had to unload 2 million shares in order to subscribe for 6 million warrants. No other insiders such as McEwen or other senior officers had sold. (Source: Gowlings LLC Law Firm) What is the significance of the 20 per cent threshold? Can we avoid it through affiliates or in side deals? An acquirer cannot accumulate more than 20 per cent ownership of a class of equity shares unless the offer to acquire securities is made to all of the holders of the class. Outside of an offer made to all of the holders of a class, accumulations in the secondary market over 20 per cent can only be made under limited exceptions (see below). Side deals are not an effective means to avoid crossing the threshold. Canadian securities laws contain anti-avoidance provisions, the effect of which is to include in the calculation of whether the 20 per cent threshold has been met (and whether the 10 per cent threshold for the early warning disclosure mentioned above has been met): shares and convertible securities owned directly, or indirectly, through affiliates or nominees; and shares owned by persons or companies acting jointly or in concert with a bidder under an agreement, commitment or understanding.
Bullboard Posts