RE:RE:RE:RE:Current EstimatesMr. Trump. You are correct when you say go pro is no comparison. Never was and people who do not know what they are talking about, often raise this silly comparison. People do need to understand the business they are investing in. That said, AVO is about cameras. That’s their base. The analytics help sales but to only a very select small group of users will use it. Other analytic companies work with other cameras manufacturers. AVO is a one stop solution to those looking at new installations and I think this is fantastic market if they can convince large Gov clients to drop their miss mash of products and go to one provider. It is however a dangerous move for them as the client is putting all their eggs in one basket and that is a battle AVO needs to overcome. Also, all these large Gov projects have to go to competitive tender and price is VERY important. So a Panasonic or pelco could make a very good case that their camera with XYZ company’s analytics is just as good. I know of no Gov employee or consultant that will refuse a camera based on disputable specifications. They will say “ well all three of you have good product and we have chosen the cheapest. THAT is the sad reality of large tendered projects. The other thing that occurs in these multimillion dollar tenders is that the cameras need to be integrated with card access systems. So unless you are specified as a fully integrated camera on the card access side, you are screwed. I have seen it happen so know it occurs. So AVO needs to fully integrated with ALL the large card access manufacturers if they stand a chance of selling to gov. They also need to be less costly than competition because few groups care about or can afford high cost of analytics. Don’t even talk to me about their card access component. Small potatoes in the big scheme of things.