RE:RE:RE:RE:Comparing zen and ccbTradergod wrote: ""And why do you insisted we only have 3N. This is not what the NR says. Its says 99.9+. Naturally, you claim this is mans nothing more than 3N. What it clearly states is 99.9 is the very least if its purity, which indicates much will be at higher grade. This is called honesty. """ Wow. this is insane. I cant even laugh its so sad.
Do you know what 3N is? It means you have 3 Nines?
If it was 4N it would be 4 Nines?
So its 99.9+ which can mean 99.91 or 99.98 but no matter what its considered 3N?
The reason I find this all very suspect that an important NR like this suddenly uses Direct Ash measurments is because GDMS is far far far more accurate. Which means they very well could have burned off enough parts that had they used GDMS they may have found its actually 99.8+% not 99.9%+ at all
So why in a very very important NR, would they choose to prove their purity with an old inaccurate method? You tell me?