RE:RE:RE:RE:Unique product..zen2twenty wrote:
I'm sure once before someone said it takes 5 years of testing for nuclear graphite. So lets be generous and say they've been testing CBB for 2 years. So 3 more years of testing, for 5 years worth of product? I also question if these companies are going to pay significantly more for miller graphite. Why would they? What they use now works. I can see a premium, but not a significant premium. I suppose, as you do chief, that once they dig the near surface graphite from miller there could be more, but maybe not. I guess the drills will answer that. Didn't you say that drilling for veins is almost impossible? They would have to drill 200+ holes in a 50mx50m area. Although, I think that was when you were pro ZEN. Kind of like how you are pro CCB now, but reverse.
Not sure who you are but your complaints or whinning sound very very familiar. The initial testing of the first NON Synthetic graphite took 5 years. Now that there are non sythetics in the space, all they do is test them against the previous synthetic to ensure its better. Thats about a 3 week testing process.
You really sound like that Nuclear Analyst we had by the name of Quincey lol
Drilling. - Drilling for veins really does not work. You locate the vein then channel it and trench it, once you are sure you are following the vein then you can "cross drill it" but in a lot of cases this is hit miss as well.
No one said this will be easy, but with the indicative pricing we have now, we now take orders and fill them as we find the material. 5 years is avery longtime allowing plenty of expansion. Personally I think we wll have 50T concentrate before end of year. but thats my opinion only.