RE:RE:Here's an article in regards to the AGMI don't disagree that WIN needs to conrol its cash burn, but I'm just making the point that if WIN actually starts growing revenues and cash flow as Skippen foresees, a buyback would serve the company and its shareholders far better. If that is to materialize, the share price is bound to move up materially, and if they want to be sitting on $100+ million in cash at that point, they can do a constructive share issue. Financial engineering is a good thing...not used often enough. Most companies get forced to issue equity or debt when they need to (BBD, for example) rather than when the share price is bloated, and that is a terrible thing for shareholders. BUY LOW, SELL HIGH...investing 101. If WIN keeps paying out 20-25 million a year in dividends, the reality of a forced issuance will be upon us before we know it, and we'll have lost EVEN MORE pennies in share price than we will have gained in dividends!