OTCPK:PDPYF - Post by User
Comment by
Matlockon May 14, 2015 1:39pm
87 Views
Post# 23729253
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Q1 - a comparison of companies
RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Q1 - a comparison of companiesTook a second look at this post.... cheap? I certainly hope the production increase didn't directly result in the cash burn.
2600 boe/d times 90 days (Jan/Feb/Mar) = 234,000 boe increase in production.
If it cost $39 million to realize 234,000 boe in production, that is a cost of $167/boe. They only earn revenue of $41.35/boe, meaning they lost $126/boe on that incremental production.
If $39 million is the cost of increasing production 234,000 boe, they'd have been smarter to shut off the taps!