Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lightstream Resources Ltd. LSTMF

"Lightstream Resources Ltd is engaged in the exploration and development of oil and natural gas in Western Canada. Its operating areas include Southeastern Saskatchewan, Central Alberta, and North-Central Alberta."


GREY:LSTMF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by chantal2468on May 24, 2015 12:44am
105 Views
Post# 23758183

i would like to see others post numbers with their...

i would like to see others post numbers with their...comments such as myself Orlandofl and others do....not just vague statements...it enlightens others and provokes other to do rational calculations for discussion...reasoning as to how those numbers are arrived at is even better....I would welcome a discussion on the relative value of the bakken vs cardium in terms of lts....if our value is currently 2.0b how much is attributed to bakken...I find that a difficult question...currently bakken 14 k vs 21 k cardium (and rest)...my belief is that even though bakken has 33% of lts production it represents between 45%-60% of the value of entire company...I have difficulty narrowing it down to a smaller range than that...especially with Alberta nap overhang affecting valuations...I would like to see intelligent discussion not someone say I g saying bakken is worth 33% of 2.0b because of its relative production....that would be very shallow thinking....this discussion would help us all in how we value other companies as well....we are here to help each other ....are we not?
Bullboard Posts