GREY:EORBF - Post by User
Comment by
princeofcuton May 29, 2015 11:34am
86 Views
Post# 23777759
RE:RE:Viola and monetization
RE:RE:Viola and monetization
RB, i agree with your post 100%...and fyi for readers a) i posted many times about the toxic financings of ORT (i was 100% right brownnoser was 100% wrong) b) i many times that ORT's leadership group was weak and needed upgrading (i was 100% right and brownnoser was 100% wrong) c) i called for the firing of RB over the failure to properly report the falure of HPA1 (i was alone in that conclusion for some time (failure of HPA1) and i was 100% right and brownnoser was 100% wrong) e) i called for a new CoB and the need to upgrade to an ICD person (i was 100% correct and this was 100% above brownnoser's pay grade) f) i called for GK to forced to joing the BoD or be canned (i was 100% correct and again this is 100% above brownnosers paygrade)...so when i take the position i have taken on Veolia people should take notice..this is a very serious issue...in all my investing years i have never seen anything like this to let a potential competitor sit on your BoD...it is a huge strategic error with tremendous downside risk to current owners...it must be resolved by the AGM or i am voting against all directors...aside from the strategic risks Veolia presents, i believe Decrary is a marginal performer on the Board as he has a very spotty attendance record and sits on no comittees..it is a typical worst of all worlds situation again for ORT and shareholders and is unacceptable to me..big tell if Decary resigns assume a hostile bid is coming and he won't resign until Veolia has everything ready to go...if ITC's credits don't entice Veolia then my risk assessment ups to over 50%