Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by Dave4444on Jun 09, 2015 5:16pm
133 Views
Post# 23813020

RE:RE:RE:RE:Quakes - Put your money where your mouth is!

RE:RE:RE:RE:Quakes - Put your money where your mouth is!
Bluesteele, you state "Hi Dave, I think you have to consider the geology of each deposit. Silt acts as a binding agent and will fill in the spaces in a matrix... in Diavik's case. Where as the glacial till at Paterson Lake comprised of a high percentage of sand will have a greater porosity and be more susceptible to hydraulic pressure." I think you really should read the Diavik construction report and details of their dike, the silt was not helpful and their glacial till was porous, but that did not stop them. They actual had to first dredge out the silt to give them a stable base to build a dam on, then they built a porous dam and once the dam was built they then scooped out right down the middle of the dam and filled it floor to ceiling with a plastic concrete impermeable barrier. The impermeable barrier meant that it made no difference that the till was permeable. Then any water getting past the barrier (none did) was to flow into a drainage system. So the fact that the till at diavik was water permeable did not stop the project.
Bullboard Posts