Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Eagle Hill Exploration Corporation V.EAG



TSXV:EAG - Post by User

Post by robert1232on Jun 16, 2015 12:13pm
133 Views
Post# 23835582

Re:Philway –“too speculative and not economically viable”

Re:Philway –“too speculative and not economically viable”All PEAs say that regarding inferred ounces. It’s not some new revelation that us stupid long time EAG investors don’t understand. Those are cautionary notes that all PEAs must contain. Right now for EAG it’s a matter of doing more infill drilling to move those inferred ounces to indicated etc.
You keep bringing this up and the fact it hasn’t broken a million ounces  ad nauseam.  Is one million some magical number? I would rather have 800,000 HIGH grade ounces with a 95% recovery rate than a million ounces of LOW grade ounces with a 65% recovery rate.
Why do you always emphasize the negative?  Why not point out some positives as well, such as  the fact that the PEA says that they have only drilled on a small foot print and veins remain open. This to me means potential.
GIVE IT A BREAK

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>