RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:VolumeCos, you are correct - In my opinion, the drop from when the plant was running close to 60mw, down to it's current level of 54-56, may be due to well issues. This is the most likely cause, but on a positive cash flow basis it is a disaster that is still not addressed by management. Turbines don't lose generation, that leaves less steam, which points to wells (or even worse - the resource itself). And as to the excerpt I included which describes the steam resource, it is not really a disclaimer - it is a fact, proven over and over, that heat-in-place significantly overestimates potential steam production. Period! hum, come to think of it, they didn't say anything about how the plant got up to 60mw in the first place!