RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:COULD NOT ZENITH DO THIS??JK, I looked back through your posts since around May 14th and see nothing other than speculation/rumor spread by your regarding the Zenith patent issue. I you feel that you have posted something concrete in the past about this, please re-post. Personally, I agree with San Fran that non of us on this board have been privy to the information from the company regarding the exact turn of events surrounding the patent issue. Maybe I missed something that the company said or that you posted. So if so, please step up and re-post or provide a link.
BDAZ
Jkj193741 wrote: Bear, I am not so negative but. In the case of Zenith I do not stand corrected. I will stand corrected when I see the new IND filed as committed. Also I have discussed the patent issue many times. One simply needs to ask RVX which two long time employees left in the last couple of years and then take a look at their C.V' wherein they list their claim to at least partial ownership in the discovery of ZEN 3365. Or in the alternative take a look at my prior posts on this topic. As to the benefit Zenith will receive from the HEPALINK deal, I would like to see the details of the proposed amendment that has been announced to the royalty share and other Zenith matters. These are simply the thoughts of an old country boy. That being the case, I would not get too excited about the importance of my so called " negative post." For Zenith to have had spent the funds to develope Zen3365; design and have approved and funded a trial for that agent, and then to withdraw the trial FO " business developed" is ,to say the least unusual. Why does not someone ask RVX or Zenith who held the competing patents, and see if they would enlighten us retail shareholders. IMHO Thanks, jk