RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:COULD NOT ZENITH DO THIS??"But I better not say much more of little old me would be accused of brining down Zenith or some such thing"
(Of course this example of sour grape is pure silliness - no one has accused anyone of "bringing down Zenith" or anything like that. Instead, let's call a spade a spade: You were accused (by me) of being misleading. And that is exactly what you and JK were doing by spreading inaccurate comments and suggestions - regardless of whether intentional or not.)
So yes: You and anyone else will be called out if you persist in spreading fear, uncertainty or doubt without any basis in fact. Same if you are blowing sunshine without any basis in fact. The goal of all honest people here is to learn. And that only happens when honesty (in fact) and fair play (in opinion) is the standard by which are judged.
Speculation, theories, ideas and the like are always welcome but should be identified as the poster as such with words such as "perhaps" or "I think" or "might" or the like.
As I have stated, I've apologized here many times when i was wrong and was either called out on that or discovered it myself.
If someone is going to say that a company is bankrupt, they better be ready to back that up. If "bankruptcy" is suddenly redefined by the poster as now meaning instead that the company is pre-market and is raising cash (as all pre-market companies do), then that should be called out. That's not what bankruptcy means anywhere else.
Same is true is a poster mistakenly thinks that if a former employee is named on a patent as an investor for a invention that that means that they have ownership in that patent. It does not an that is an inaccuracy that should be corrected when spread.
Barry Goldwater once said: "Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice." Same is true of extremism in defense of truth and accuracy and fair play.
EOM