RE:RE:phoenix haute and pyr...ana,
it appears to me some interesting financing/ownership things on the go here that i haven't quite got figured out (if that is even possible as so much in documents is "unnamed" parties) but that date on one of the patents is later than when it appears ph may have sold assets to pyr..i suspect it was part of the assets but date doesn't support that 100% (i assume that as it appears no other IP assignments since then to PH and only to pyr)..what do you know about PHT you make some definitive statements