RE:RE:2 SidesThat's the type of rebuttal I'm referring to.
Both sides are built on hope. You obviously hope the stock does poorly and always have since you reared your head many years ago. Most usually hope their stock does well.
That hope is built on information. Information can be credible or opinion or horsesh*t.
You meantion new hires. Yes. There have been. They are some of the top brass in the industry. Reputable individuals who have carried their companies to the top ranks in their sector.
Options granted. Yes. The company isn't generating major revenues yet. This is the way they compensate these people until the product is ready to go to market. This is common practise. They obviously feel that this time is near or they wouldn't have made the move after all these years to add these individuals all around the same time as they have done. One could deduce that we should see some activity soon.
Endless delays. No. That's the kind of antagonistic response I'm talking about. There have been some delays, which is also common in any new tech. Many of these were simply delays in projected timelines. They made a best guess and hoped to be on the mark, but sometime unforeseens come in to play and delays are inevitable. Patience is a virtue. All delays to date have eventually been met.
If you're going to take the negative approach, at least do it without mindless emotion behind the words and present a logical supported case.