RE:RE:RE:RE:Special meeting tomorrowhalcro wrote: halcro wrote: halcro wrote: halcro wrote: No chatter on the board about the bagholders flocking off to Toronto en masse to vote in person and to gladhand/grill Eric Sprott about the future of the company.
It's also an opportunity for those bagholders who don't travel much to go to Toronto (365 Bay Street, Suite 400, Toronto, Ontario...which is also the address of the law firm representing 2176423 Ontario Ltd) and take in the sights.
Picking your nose in public is as unwelcome in Toronto as it is in Germany, so be forewarned.
Meeting was to commence at 10:00 a.m., Toronto time. It's now 12:15 p.m. in Toronto, so where's the release???
Hmmm. No news!!!
Did 2176423 Ontario Ltd back out of the deal, asking for a 10-cent strike price (190 million shiny new shares instead of a mere 63,333,333 shiny new shares)?
Did an outbreak of nosepickers sicken attendees, with a fleet of ambulances taking away the quorum before votes could be cast??
Was there such an excited throng of exuberant bagholders that the capacity of the room was exceeded and the fire marshal shut it down???
Something to think about over the weekend.
WHY NO NEWS RELEASE ABOUT THE SPECIAL MEETING, SLATED TO BE HOLD ON JUNE 30, 2015, IN TORONTO??? In most times, in the stock promotion game, NO NEWS IS NOT GOOD NEWS!!!
The following section of NI 51-102 applies only to non-venture issuers: As Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. is a venture issuer, there is no requirement under NI 51-102 for the company to file the results.
11.3 Voting Results
A reporting issuer that is not a venture issuer must, promptly following a meeting of securityholders at which a matter was submitted to a vote, file a report that discloses, for each matter voted upon
(a) a brief description of the matter voted upon and the outcome of the vote; and
(b) if the vote was conducted by ballot, including a vote on a matter in which votes are cast both in person and by proxy, the number or percentage of votes cast for, against or withheld from the vote.
Part 12.1 of NI 51-102 does require the filing of articles of incorporation, amalgamation, continuation, etc. by reporting issuers. Therefore, once the continuation has been completed, we would expect the issuer to file this information on SEDAR.
Of course, a bagholder must ask: What was voted upon, LOL?
NOT THAT THERE"S SEEMINGLY ANY REQUIREMENT THAT AN ANSWER BE PROVIDED!!!