GREY:VMSTF - Post by User
Comment by
LongonZincon Jul 16, 2015 9:04pm
143 Views
Post# 23932463
RE:RE:Supreme Court of Canada November 13, 2014
RE:RE:Supreme Court of Canada November 13, 2014Things to remember. First and formost, none or next to none of the deposit lies on any property controlled or historically controlled by Dunlop. For there to be an issue of good faith with respect to their claim, it would and could be on claims in which they had status upon, to date no viable deposits have been located on the aforementioned claims. 98% or more of the viable deposit appears to be on claims historically held by Hudbay...at best the Dunlop suit is frivolous. It would be nice to see a countersuit for a few 100 million against this obniouxs claimet.