RE:RE:38 plus replyROTFLAMAO...and now we have artir (what a hilarioius first name to be saddled with)....in full on bagholder admission mode...remember folks bagholders are often defined by a number of classic basic failures so lets post his admission and then i will analyse it:
<<It seemed to me that our previous partner actually paid to sandbbag us as they set about getting Valstar approved and marketted. Nice guys they were, and they did delay mcna by almost a decade. When I saw that they were doing a comparitive test using mitomycin I nearly crapped. It was obvious then.>>
...so arithor expresses deep paranoia and conspiracy theories when investment goes very bad..which is #1 id of a bagholder
...then more hilarious is this artherr admits something was "obvious" and yet in true bagholder failure #2, even presuming a fix was in (which i guarentee it wasn't) arthar kept owning BNC when any rational investor concluding what arthir did (wrong input right output) would've sold their investment in BNC and moved on...
...but pharty arty kept owning, kept crying and whining, kept paranoiing...
..my conclusion which BTW is supported by the price of BNC and the skill of ENDP (which BTW is and was much higher than BNC ever was) is that MCNA PIII data was risky on its own to get FDA approval and so would benefit from the SOP confirmatory study with a comparator arm (which is SOP)..unfortunately ENDP was likely boxed in and got a bad comparator and rationally decided then MCNA wasn't worth the risk and so gave back rights to BNC...IMO the key is how much weight AdComm (assuming no RTF) places on unmet need vs. what is limited data...and then whether the FDA listens to AdComm (as i suspect ENDP will be pushing for rejection)...
..but the bagholderism on this MB is truly hilarious..
...and remember alway arrter your ego exceeds your intelligence and place in life..but as you are my MB toy keep entertaining me..
...and i have trained you in short time, no more pottymouth and now (for my entertainment) are posting as the irrational rube you are..