Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Regent Pacific Properties Inc V.RPP

Regent Pacific Properties Inc. is a Canada-based real estate development and investment company. The Company is engaged in the rental of commercial and residential real estate properties located in Canada. All the properties are in one region: Edmonton, Alberta. The Company also invests in residential and commercial properties located in Edmonton, Alberta. The Company has a portfolio consisting of about 72,675 square feet three-story commercial office tower and attached single-story bays with an underground parking facility (Cassel Centre), located in Edmonton, Alberta. It also has two residential condominium units located in Edmonton, Alberta. The Company seeks to expand its portfolio of income-producing properties.


TSXV:RPP - Post by User

Comment by MartyPon Aug 28, 2000 1:09pm
278 Views
Post# 2394850

Trade resumption should take place...

Trade resumption should take place...by tomorrow, according to Michelle Cormier. She wouldn't give me any information about the news to come, however, when asked if repap has considered a roll back in the recent months/years, she told me that a rollback has been considered but the company did not feel it would be in the shareholders best interest. And when asked if the company is still of the same opinion, she replied, "yes". All the Best Marty P
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>