RE:RE:RE:CONTRACTS AND LICENSING WILL CONTINUE TO MOVE FORWARDThe way this came across to me is that IMP is breaking into new markets that need the service. Maybe they give up some % to get into 4 countries at once but to the benefit of scope, imo a fair trade off. I don't expect big cashflows from this but it can't be denied it's a healthy step in this recovery/turnaround. Knowing the terms would be good, but maybe you could shed some light on why those terms would be kept in house (other than for the purpose of creating an illusion... perhaps conditions and contingencies are still be detailed? Can't be easy to create fixed terms across 4 broadly different countries with completely independent sets of regulations etc).