Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s): FCUUF

Metals & Mining Industrial Metals & Minerals

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.

TSX:FCU - Post by User

Fission Uranium Corp

Bullboard Posts

Comment by dman34on Jul 27, 2015 1:32pm

173 Views

Post# 23963612

RE:RE:Emailing Dev. Why?

Give me a break Quakes. How the heck is posting Dev's email address disgusting? Any shareholder can email him at any time we please. We pay his salary for chr*st sakes. The guy has kicked us all in the balls with this deal looking out for his own interest with complete disregard for our investment.

The guy has some explaining to do. He's articulated this deal like a complete buffoon.

quakes99 wrote: What concerns me more is that a poster would publish Dev's private email address on the very day he is sitting down for final negotiations to meet tonight's deadline. That's his messaging path for communicating with all the parties involved in the deal. Outrageous that someone would purposefully do that today of all days. Just shows how low some people will go. Disgusting! :-0

thinkahead wrote: Does anyone actually think emailing management who have already committed to a merger makes a difference? I don't think so. Is management concerned about retail holders?