RE:undecidedHi 99>66.. i disagree, voting no now, does not mean no one wants PLS.. Voting no means shareholders believe this merger is not in their best interest and will send a message firstly to management, secondly to any potential suitors that low balls will not be tolerated.. surely more liquidation will follow either outcome, unless they prove up as much as possible, stop drilling and put a for sale sign on the gate- but that would mean job losses, (like Dev's)...as for a 2 to 5 year wait, that might be the case regardless of the vote outcome, but i believe a merger will not hasten that time frame in the least bit and could in fact make the wait longer if mergco markets itself as an entire entity.. My personal belief, which has been confirmed lately by managements comments, (Ross), the merged company plans to sell off PLS as a single entity, why..?- two fold- again, all just my opinion is this way, pls is easier marketed, (the original story we were told), also LL gets a piece of the action while Dev and co keep their jobs ..nothing more, nothing less.. And if no offer arrives asap, the status quo continues for years to come, more PP's, more rollbacks, more unfounded promises.. it's called the mining exploration industry for a reason..
good day 99...:)