Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based uranium company and the owner/developer of the high-grade, near-surface Triple R uranium deposit. The Company is the 100% owner of the Patterson Lake South uranium property. Its Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, a large, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within a 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises over 17 contiguous claims totaling 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin. Additionally, the Company has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling approximately 11,148-hectares and the La Rocque property comprising two claims totaling over 959 hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan. The La Rocque property is prospective for high-grade uranium and is located five km south of Cameco’s La Rocque Uranium Zone.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by sudzie191on Aug 20, 2015 2:27pm
135 Views
Post# 24036864

RE:RE:THe danger of voting NO

RE:RE:THe danger of voting NONo company will go after the 175 million lbs as its uneconomical to build the mine and the mill for such a deposit. Perhaps if NXE comes up with good numbers, but management have already poo pooed NXE, a mistake I think. So your 175 million lbs will just sit there, FCU runs out of cash or further dilutes. That's a big danger, and the most obvious outcome of the No vote, as I see things.
letsgetready wrote: I disagree. A NO vote will mean we keep 100% of PLS. A no vote is more likely on the resource upgrade (coming with the PEA) and if a good PEA comes out, people will want to keep PLS as a pureplay. This good news will be what causes the share price to rise and people to vote No in a more uncertain manner. We'll be talking 130+ million pounds and the PEA soon and that's excluding summer drilling. The good news is there and when we get rid of the DML anchor, we'll rise not sink. The analysts will then start talking 175 million pounds. We won't go down as a result of owning 100% of that.
sudzie191 wrote:
If no alternative off before the vote and the result is no...............potentially here is what happens. A further share price drop.......... Why? FCU will be finishing their summer drilling program and all the good news or rumours thereof will have been fed into the convincing folks to vote yes. So if no, summer drilling program is over and no more drilling until the winter, and perhaps not even then. Why? FCU will have used up considerable treasury for summer drilling program, the PEA, and in the process of all the preparations for the merger, so perhaps not enough money left for a meaningful winter drilling program. And with the depressed share price perhaps even more so after the no vote, management likely won't go to the markets for more drilling money, but just sit on the situation until the uranium market improves considerable, 1 year, perhaps 2. And if no white knight comes along to buy FCU at these low prices, you can bet your little ducky with confidence that no white knight is coming the day after the No vote or any time soon after. I could see the No vote resulting in a share price drop of FCU much lower. On the other hand a Yes vote gets FCU into the larger picture of expanding resources within the larger company, which is in the midst of the very strong local developments on the east side of the basin and with a share in the hi grade mill. It also sets up the situation for RIO to go after the merged company because of the DML's 22% share of the mill, and Caneco countering that with their own higher offer. RIO won't likely take a run at FCU before the merger, because that doesn't include the mill deal, but diverts them to the west side, and would require them to do a separate run at DML to get access to the mill. So No voting is like voting for a potential further financial loss for your current shares, without much hope of recovery for perhaps a long time. Anyone suggesting a share price rebound after the No vote wins, is whistling gypsy I think. Not trying to convince anyone what to do, how to vote, just pointing out what I think is obvious risks.




Bullboard Posts