Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Kicking Horse Energy Inc. V.CEX



TSXV:CEX - Post by User

Post by Valueseek1982on Aug 28, 2015 1:00pm
102 Views
Post# 24059951

Not a Basher and Don't have a short but...

Not a Basher and Don't have a short but...As my title suggests, I am not a basher and I do not short this stock.

I do have several long positions in the energy space - some low (for the times) risk and some high risk.

While this is a stock that I have been in and out of the last year. There are some fundamental issues that I see at the moment - Righand1 (the IR for this company and several others CPG, PHM, ) may be able to answer for me.

How does this company intend to keep a large majority of its land and what do you see as the core holdings going forward. I agree east kakwa is a great asset but I challenge the upside to the project right now. The company has been battling declines in a low oil price environement and has booked a significant amount of inventory there (middle montney). While i agree as well there are multiple horizons, capital will natural gravitate to highest ROC for a given play. Does this mean the other horizons are less prolific (probably though this is my opinion based on current capital allocation.

I am concerned that insiders do not own more. The DCK board members have the highest ownership and it seems that there has not been a buy in at these levels by any insider. This is not a deal breaker by any means but disappointing none the less.

With regards to West Kakwa, I understand the idea behind this, let others de-risk and value up the land. Only issue is on expiries and my thesis on deploying capital to your best projects. If the industry slows down de-risking this land will these lands be at risk of expiring thus reducing future upside.

these are questions i hope people are asking. I ask these of every company I own the high and low risk. If i am going to throw capital at an investment though let it be a binary outcome 0 or 1 (with 1 being a 10 bagger, 0 being s*** out of luck)

As always, appreciate the responses from the IR team on the board
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>