one misconception
Just one thing I would like to point out- I have seen a few posters lately calling out Lundin for this ridiculous low ball bid offer and I do agree this offer is terrible and that is why I will be voting NO. However, for what its worth, would you not want a CEO that is acting with your best interests in mind to get the best deal possible if you were a dml holder? Would it not be nice to have a CEO like that? I feel the blame for this deal rests squarely on the shoulders of our own CEO for not acting in the best interests of his own shareholders and for that matter, his own damn company! Lundin is only doing his job, I wish I could say the same about Dev.